Pensions Ombudsman determination

National Employment Savings Trust · CAS-66196-B5X9

Complaint upheldRedress £1,0002022
Get your free legal insight →Email to a colleague
Get your free legal insight on this case →

Verbatim text of this Pensions Ombudsman determination. Sourced directly from the Pensions Ombudsman published register. The Pensions Ombudsman is a statutory tribunal — its determinations are public record. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase.

Full determination

CAS-66196-B5X9

Ombudsman’s Determination Applicant Mr I

Scheme National Employment Savings Trust (the Scheme)

Respondent The Protein Ice Cream Company Limited (the Employer)

Outcome

Complaint summary

Background information, including submissions from the parties

1 CAS-66196-B5X9

Caseworker’s Opinion

• The Caseworker stated that TPO’s normal approach, in cases such as these, was to seek agreement from all parties on the facts of the complaint, including the dates and amounts of contributions involved. She said that, as the Employer had not responded to any of TPO’s communications, she had to base his Opinion solely on the information provided by Mr I.

• The Caseworker said that she had no reason to doubt the information provided by Mr I, so, in the Caseworker’s Opinion, on the balance of probabilities, contributions had been deducted from Mr I’s salary that had not been paid into the Scheme. In addition, the Employer had not paid any of the employer contributions that were due over the same period. As a result of its maladministration, Mr I was not in the financial position he ought to be in.

• In the Caseworker’s view Mr I had suffered significant distress and inconvenience due to the Employer’s maladministration. In the opinion of the Caseworker an award of £500 for non-financial injustice was appropriate in the circumstances.

Ombudsman’s decision

2 CAS-66196-B5X9

Directions

(i) pay Mr I £1,000 for the serious distress and inconvenience he has experienced.

(ii) produce a schedule (the Schedule) showing the employee contributions deducted from Mr I’s pay in respect of the period of his employment. The Schedule shall also include the corresponding employer contributions that were due to the Scheme; and

(iii) forward the Schedule to Mr I.

(i) pay the missing contributions to the Scheme;

(ii) establish with the Scheme whether the late payment of contributions has meant that fewer units were purchased in Mr I’s Scheme account than he would have otherwise secured, had the contributions been paid on time; and

(iii) pay any reasonable administration fee should the Scheme administrator charge a fee for carrying out the above calculation.

Within 14 days of receiving confirmation from the Scheme of any shortfall in Mr I’s units, pay the cost of purchasing any additional units required to make up the shortfall.

Anthony Arter

Pensions Ombudsman 1 December 2022

3 CAS-66196-B5X9

Appendix

Date Employee contributions Employer contributions

30/11/2019 £0.00 £0.00

31/12/2019 £141.07 £84.65

31/01/2020 £141.07 £84.65

29/02/2020 £141.07 £84.65

31/03/2020 £141.07 £84.65

30/04/2020 £99.01 £59.41

31/05/2020 £99.01 £59.41

30/06/2020 £99.01 £59.41

31/07/2020 £99.00 £59.40

31/08/2020 £99.00 £59.40

30/09/2020 £99.00 £59.40

30/10/2020 – Payslip £99.00 £59.40 missing

Total £1,257.31 £754.43

4