Pensions Ombudsman determination
Nhs Pension Scheme · CAS-44265-V3C8
Verbatim text of this Pensions Ombudsman determination. Sourced directly from the Pensions Ombudsman published register. The Pensions Ombudsman is a statutory tribunal — its determinations are public record. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase.
Full determination
CAS-44265-V3C8
Ombudsman’s Determination Applicant Mrs Y
Scheme NHS Pension Scheme (the Scheme)
Respondent NHS Business Services Authority (NHS BSA)
Outcome
Complaint summary
Background information, including submissions from the parties
1 CAS-44265-V3C8
Adjudicator’s Opinion
2 CAS-44265-V3C8
Mrs Y did not accept the Adjudicator’s Opinion and the complaint was passed to me to consider. Mrs Y provided her further comments which do not change the outcome. In summary, she said:-
• She used to be able to see both entitlements in full on the TRS for both the 1995 and 2008 Sections of the Scheme up until the point she took her 1995 pension in 2017. The manual statement provided after that was not as detailed as the TRS and did not give the projections for lump sums on the 2008 Section benefits. The manual statement became a 15 month plus statement because of the time it took to produce it.
• She does not consider the email from NHS BSA as business like, rather she considers it curt, blunt and wrong.
• She feels the Adjudicator could not possibly say how much distress, anxiety and inconvenience she has been personally caused.
I note the additional points raised by Mrs Y but I agree with the Adjudicator’s Opinion.
Ombudsman’s decision
3 CAS-44265-V3C8
Anthony Arter Pensions Ombudsman
22 June 2022
4