FOS decisions / Insurance Pricing & Renewal
Insurance Pricing & Renewal
Financial Ombudsman Service final decisions, reproduced verbatim from the FOS published decisions register.
Decisions
8
Upheld
2
Not upheld
6
Avg redress
£100
Upheld complaints (2)
Xbridge Limited
DRN-5920936Insurers must provide clear, fair and not misleading information about renewal terms, including what constitutes a change that could affect the renewal price.
UpheldRedress £100Mar 2026AXA Insurance UK Plc
DRN-6230346An insurer has no obligation to renew a policy, but must not provide false reasons for non-renewal.
UpheldRedress £100
Not-upheld complaints (6)
Intact Insurance UK Limited
DRN-6138725Insurers may adjust renewal premiums based on claims inflation and refreshed pricing models without treating consumers unfairly, even when individual risk profiles remain unchanged.
Not upheldAviva Insurance Limited
DRN-5816359Insurers have commercial discretion to assess risk and set premiums based on their own underwriting methodology, and they are not required to disclose commercially sensitive pricing models.
Not upheldU K Insurance Limited trading as Direct Line
DRN-6240357Insurers may adjust premiums based on legitimate underwriting factors including age, claims inflation, and veterinary cost increases, provided pricing is applied consistently and consumers are informed of potential increases.
Not upheldBUPA Insurance Limited
DRN-6130453Insurers may charge different premiums for different policy types (continuing cover vs moratorium policies) provided they treat existing policyholders consistently with their internal guidelines and do not arbitrarily single out individuals
Not upheldIntact Insurance UK Limited
DRN-5867783Insurers have commercial discretion in pricing decisions, and the ombudsman can only assess whether a consumer was treated fairly or less favourably than others, not whether the price itself is reasonable.
Not upheldAXA Insurance UK Plc
DRN-5977492Insurers have discretion to set insurance premiums based on their commercial risk assessment, provided they treat all customers in similar circumstances fairly and consistently.
Not upheld