UK case law

Secretary of State for the Home Department, R (on the application of) v Norris

[2005] EWHC ADMIN 1992 · High Court (Administrative Court) · 2005

Get your free legal insight →Email to a colleague
Get your free legal insight on this case →

The verbatim text of this UK judgment. Sourced directly from The National Archives Find Case Law. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase — every word below is the original ruling, under Crown copyright and the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Full judgment

1. MR JUSTICE OUSELEY: I am going to grant you the extension sought. It seems to me that there is a proper basis set out in the material for granting that extension. I understand the concerns expressed by White and Case. 2. Of course, there is a problem in expressing any extension to be final and I do not do so. It is not for me to fetter the decision of any subsequent judge as to whether any further extension, if sought, should be granted in the circumstances which may apply. It is not always beneficial for final decisions to be forced for want of an extension of time, particularly if consideration given to points in greater depth might actually result in a favourable decision to the person whose extradition is sought. 3. For present purposes I would grant the extension.

Secretary of State for the Home Department, R (on the application of) v Norris [2005] EWHC ADMIN 1992 — UK case law · My AI Finance